Oskar Bertrand wrote:

> Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> 
>> No, you should see what compressionlevel works best, that's my whole
>> point...
> 
> My point is that as computer/internet technology progresses, your point
> becomes increasingly irrelevant.
> 
> 
> 
> Oskar

Apply that logic to other areas and it just becomes silly. "Hey we can clear
3 rainforests of trees in one week, when 10 years ago it took us a year!
Wow, thankyou technology." 

Just because you have the resources, doesn't mean you should waste them. in
most cases here, 600k is wasted when a posted image is 700k.

Like Zeger said, if the image is really interesting, people as for the
source, or people either ask for a larger version (most of the time the
creator hosts it off site it seems.) 

Resources, no matter what kind, are not infinite.

Post a reply to this message